One motion: work that repeats, runs on a rubric, and waits on a human call. Everything below follows from that.
We build an agent workforce for one kind of work: high-volume, repetitive, rubric-based back-office work that waits on a human call. We rebuild one workflow inside your systems, agents carry the volume, your experts hold the judgment, and your team runs it on our platform after handoff.
High-volume: it happens hundreds of times a month, not once a quarter. Repetitive: the same steps every time. Rubric-based: a spec, checklist, or pricing sheet already defines what correct looks like. Waits on a human call: somewhere in the chain a person has to review, approve, or fight an exception.
Three examples. An adjuster's estimate lands as a PDF: someone compares it line by line to the scope of work, documents the underpayment, drafts the supplement with photos, and chases the carrier until the revised estimate reconciles. Every incoming certificate needs tracking: compliance documents chased from hundreds of suppliers, matched to the right records, filed before work can proceed. Every completed job should have an invoice: did it go out, does it match the work order and the supplier PO, why is job margin drifting.
Notice none of this lives inside one software tool. There's no button in the ERP for "compare the adjuster's estimate to our scope and draft the supplement." Today that gap is staffed with people. That's the work agents take.
Three-part test: the work repeats, it runs on a rubric, and it waits on a human call. Claims and supplement recovery, supplier certificate matching, invoice and order reconciliation, filings, underwriting files. It's one motion recurring across departments, not a menu of products.
Not every workflow passes, and we'll tell you which ones to skip. Check your workflow against the test in sixty seconds →
Use them, they're good tools. But a tool assists a person; it doesn't run a workflow. Everyone has the models. Taking invoice approval from five people and about two weeks to one person and about two days, inside the systems already there, with a full audit trail and a savings number you can underwrite, is the scarce part.
And keeping agents accurate as data and models drift is an engineering job nobody inside wants to own indefinitely. That last mile is what we build and what our engine maintains.
Some vendors audit your workflows, deploy some agents, and move on. That leaves you owning the maintenance: watching for drift, fixing what breaks, no one on call.
We don't leave. The platform stays. It checks the agents daily and catches drift as data and models change. Your team runs it, we keep it current.
No. Agents run on the systems you already use, in your environment, your cloud or ours. Raw data never leaves, and every decision is logged, so the audit trail is clean for compliance, diligence, and exit.
Cade, the platform from YourCadre, stays as your own version and your team runs it. It checks the agents daily, catches drift as data and models change, and surfaces the fix; your expert applies the judgment. Want something handled differently? Write it in plain English and Cade turns it into the right updates.
When something needs deeper repair, our engine fixes it once, centrally, for every client.
Live in weeks, measured against your pre-deployment baseline, not a demo.
Pricing has two lines: a one-time deployment fee to stand up the workflow, then a managed AI fee to run it. No per-seat licenses. If we can't find a number worth taking out, we say so before you spend anything.
Operating companies carrying high-volume back-office work with no engineering bench to automate it, and investors who want that done across more than one company. If the volume, the rubric, and the human gate are there, the model fits.